Below are descriptions and LiDAR slope-shade imagesfor the first three domains.
- D1: a mountainous, rocky surface with high slopes
- D2: a tundra-covered hilly area with good fluvial network and diffusive hillslopes
- D3: a low relief area with many coalessed thaw lakes, north of the moraines
- D4: a small region with known thermokarst activity between 2009 and 2012
- (this area is not yet defined...considering Horn Lake or Itkillik Riverside features)
??
For each domain I will:
- Extract a subset of elevation data from the tiles with the most coverage. If there are overlapping tiles from the same data source, I will mosaic those two together (best method? mean? max? largest area?).
- D1
- Aerial LiDAR Data:
- (will need to be merged before analysis)
- m4_5_6
- m7_8_9_11
- ASP_Par_4m:
- WV01_12JUN212145259-P1BS_R2C1-102001001B04AA00_WV0
- ASP_Bay_4m_W1:
- WV01_12JUN202207366-P1BS-102001001C17A600_WV01_12J
- WV01_12JUN202207377-P1BS-102001001C17A600_WV01_12J
- ASP_Bay_4m_WV2:
- (No Data in Domain)
- SETSM:
- SETSM_ArcticDEM_46_18_5_3_DEM
- D2
- Aerial LiDAR Data:
- m18192922
- ASP_Par_4m:
- WV01_12JUN152224058-P1BS_R4C1-102001001C555C00_WV0
- ASP_Bay_4m_W1
- (two tiles, same half-coverage, different dates):
- WV01_12FEB132219064-P1BS-1020010017AD8900_WV01_12F
- WV01_12OCT212212221-P1BS-102001001EB61400_WV01_12O
- ASP_Bay_4m_WV2:
- WV02_12OCT022230092-P1BS-103001001B4F9F00_WV02_12O
- SETSM:
- (strange merge of 2 datasets, one rough, one smooth?)
- SETSM_ArcticDEM_47_18_1_5_DEM
- D3
- Aerial LiDAR Data:
- m2728293031
- ASP_Par_4m:
- WV01_12JUN032207416-P1BS_R3C1-102001001CE78000_WV0
- ASP_Bay_4m_WV2:
- WV02_12OCT202307414-P1BS-103001001C901700_WV02_12O
- WV02_11APR062258334-P1BS-103001000A751700_WV02_11A
- SETSM:
- SETSM_ArcticDEM_47_19_1_2_DEM
- D4
- ????
- After extracting the datasets within each domain, I will run a standard set of calculations, assuming that the airborne lidar is the 'most accurate' dataset.
- Straight difference (LiDAR - stereoDEM)
- output map of differences
- look for spatial coherence in differences, suggesting georeferencing errors
- output histogram of differences
- good for comarison against other stereoDEM datasets
- output bulk statistics of differences
- good for comparison between domains
No comments:
Post a Comment